How Old Was Aisha? [Sources]

Aisha was married at the age of 6 and the marriage was consummated when she was 9.

Sahih Bukhari reference

  • Volume 5, Book 58, Hadith 234
  • Volume 5, book 58, Hadith 236
  • Volume 7, Book 62, Hadith 64
  • Volume 7, Book 62, Hadith 65
  • Volume 7, Book 62, Hadith 88
  • Volume 7, Book 62, Hadith 90
  • Volume 8, Book 72, Hadith 151
  • Volume 9, Book 87, Hadith 140

Sahih Muslim reference

  • Book 8, Hadith 3309
  • Book 8, Hadith 3310
  • Book 8, Hadith 3311

Sunan Abu Dawud reference

  • Book 41, Hadith 4915
  • Book 41, Hadith 4916
  • Book 41, Hadith 4917

Sunan Nasai reference

  • Book 4, Hadith 3257
  • Book 4, Hadith 3258
  • Book 4, Hadith 3259
  • Book 4, Hadith 3260
  • Book 4, Hadith 3380
  • Book 4, Hadith 3381

Sunan Tirmihdi reference

  • Book 2, Hadith 1109

How can any one escape the conclusion that Muhammad was a pedophile.


Muhammad the Nymphomaniac [Sources]

Narrated Muhammad bin Al-Muntathir:
on the authority of his father that he had asked ‘Aisha (about the Hadith of Ibn ‘Umar). She said, “May Allah be Merciful to Abu ‘Abdur-Rahman. I used to put scent on Allah’s Apostle and he used to go round his wives, and in the morning he assumed the Ihram, and the fragrance of scent was still coming out from his body.” [Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 5, Hadith 267]

Narrated Qatada:
Anas bin Malik said, “The Prophet used to visit all his wives in a round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number.” I asked Anas, “Had the Prophet the strength for it?” Anas replied, “We used to say that the Prophet was given the strength of thirty (men).” And Sa’id said on the authority of Qatada that Anas had told him about nine wives only (not eleven). [Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 5, Hadith 268]

Narrated ‘Aisha:
…during his fatal ailment, Allah’s Apostle, used to ask his wives, “Where shall I stay tomorrow? Where shall I stay tomorrow?” He was looking forward to Aisha’s turn. So all his wives allowed him to stay where he wished, and he stayed at ‘Aisha’s house till he died there. He died on the day of my usual turn (of having sex) at my house. Allah took him unto him while his head was between my chest and my neck and his saliva was mixed with my SALIVA. [Sahih Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62, Hadith 144]

As soon as the pain subsided, he got up and visited with his wives just as he had always done. [Life of Muhammad by Muhammad Husayn Haykal, Chapter The Prophet’s Sickness and Death]

No matter how much we sugar coat the truth, the basic fact of the matter is that Muhammad is no Prophet, at best he was delusional which is definetly a no-no for a prophet. There is so much that can be written on Muhammad but I guess this is enough.

Section U3.8

U3.8 (N:) As for Allah’s creating acts, we believe that the real doer or everything is Allah. He is the one who burns, not the fire or the person who lighted the fire; He is the one who cuts, not the knife or the person holding the knife; He is the one who drowns a man, not the water or the person who threw him in, and so forth. Here, people always raise the question that if Allah Most High is the real doer, why are people held responsible? The answer is that Allah Most High does not hold people responsible for creating the act, but rather for choosing the act. One proof of this is that a person who cannot choose is not held responsible, such as someone asleep, insane, a child, forced, unremembering, or someone who makes an honest mistake. The legal responsibility of such people is lifted because they lack full voluntary choice. Another proof is that Nimrod sinned for choosing to burn Ibrahim (upon whom be peace) even though Ibrahim did not burn (koran 21:69); and that Ibrahim (Upon whom be peace) became the Friend of the All-merciful for choosing to sacrifice his son out of obedience to Allah,even though his knife did not cut and his son was not sacrificed (Koran 37:105), all of this showing that the servant is held  responsible for his choice, which scholars of the divine unity (tawhid) term the servant’s acquisition (kasb).
As for Allah’s eternally preexistent knowledge, we believe that Allah knows everything before, during, and after it is, and knows how it is when it occurs. But does the servant have acess to this knowledge? Not at all. So the servant chooses to do acts on the basis of a desire within himself, not because he knows Allah’s knowledge, and he is held responsible for his choice even though it corresponds with Allah’s eternally preexistent knowledge.
It is clear from the above that belief in destiny means that Muslims believe Allah has destined and ordained matters in past eternity, and that nothing in existence lies outside of His eternal will, and He is the Creator of everything, while the servant is only held responsible for his own choice (Mudhakkirai fi al-tawhid (y113), 41-12). [Relliance of the Traveller, U3.8, pg613-4]

First humans are only tools in the hand of Allah ie when we light a fire it is Allah who has lighted it and burned the wood. Second everything is predestined which reinforces the first point.

This is the kind of belief that destroys a nation for eternity. I can criticize Islam as much as I can but Muslim scholars are the biggest liability to Islam.

Sultan Erdogan

Sultan Erdogan initially supported the alAssad regime during the Arab Spring but then quickly changed its foregn policy

The Turkish Foreign Ministry initially recommended not getting involved, but Prime Minister Erdoğan, perhaps vainly, saw Turkey’s potential role as decisive and gradually became more engaged in the developing conflict. [Click For Full Article]

Phantom F-4

The downing of Turkish Plane F-4 Phantom by Syrians in June of last year must have come as a surpise to the Turks. But how the whole event unfolded must have hurt Sultan Erdogan even more as can be read here.

But the Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu let the world know what the Turkish Govt (or Sultan Erdogan) was thinking as can be seen below

But then the foreign minister started deviating (or not) from the script. He stressed, “No matter how the downed Turkish jet saga unfolds, we will always stand by [the] Syrian people”. And this; “We will always stand by Syrian people until the advent of a democratic regime there.” Forget about the F-4 Phantom; the “Syrian people” may sleep soundly because the heart of the matter remains regime change. [Click For Full Article]

Neo-Ottmonism in Iraq

While the Turkish Opposition parties don’t want Erdogan to go into Syria, with or without American support, but rather to move into Iraq

Instead, they said, launching a full-scale, deep and lasting land forces operation into northern Iraq would be a better use of resources and soldiers’ lives in order to put an end to the Kurdish separatist violence. [Click For Full Article]

24 November 2015

With the blessing of the USA (USAF F-15s) the Turks (F-16s) downed the Russian (Su-24).  So what happened?

The Turkish Air Force contends they warned the Russian aircraft 10 times over a span of 5 minutes before their jets opened fire. Visibly furious, Russian President Vladimir Putin responded to the Turkish version of events by calling the incident a “stab in the back by terrorist helpers.” [Click for Full Article]

The Turks claim that the Russian Plane entered Turkish airspace fopr 2-3 seconds while the Turks warned the Russians plane for 5 minutes. It smells so much like an ambush. Putting everything in perspective the Turks had a certain moral high ground until Sultan Erdogan dropped this bomb

… Ankara had not recognised the aircraft as Russian when it shot it down. [Click for Full Article]

There are plenty of news and analysis over this incident of the Russain downed plane as one can see here and here. Both discussing how the events are transpiring and what possible outcomes there can be.

Could this be part of the incidents that will later be regarded as the Archduke Franz Ferdinand assasination. Only time will tell. However Sultan Erdogan seems to be doing the wrong things and the world is beginning to see aspiration of a Sultan in Erdogan from buying oil from the ISIS/ISIL to cracking down on legitimate critics, protesters and reporters to down right “massacre” of Cizre.

At this point I would love it if Sulatan stopped hearing the voices of his advisors or any voices he might be hearing in his head. hee needs to take a vacation and let the other people in the government handle this problem along with the international community.

Ahl alDhimma [Sources]

Who are not Ahl alDhimma?

… those who are idol worshippers (dis: o9.9 (n:)), or those who do not have a Sacred Book or something that could have been a Book. [Reliance of the Traveller, O11.2, pg 607]

… As for the pseudo-scriptures of cults that have appeared since Islam (n: such as the Sikhs, Baha’ is, Mormons, Qadianis, etc.), they neither are nor could be a Book, since the Koran is the final revelation (dis: w4).) [Reliance of the Traveller, O11.2, pg 607]

So idol-worshippers and any cults after the advent of Islam can not be part of the agreement that makes non-muslims a second-class citizen.

What things can be regulated by the agreement?

… follow the rules of Islam  (A: those mentioned below (o11.5) and those involving public behavior  and dress, though in acts of worship and their private lives, the subject communities have their own laws, judges, and courts, enforcing the rules of their own religion among themselves); (b) and pay the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya)  [Reliance of the Traveller, O11.3, pg 607]

… (2) are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar); [Reliance of the Traveller, O.11.5, pg 608]

(4) must keep to the side of the street;
(5) may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;
(6) are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;
(7) and are forbidden to build new churches. [Reliance of the Traveller, O11.5, pg 608]

Basically all the individual liberty is taken from ahl alDhimma. But Wait there is more

They are forbidden to reside in the Hijaz, meaning the area and towns around Mecca, Medina, and Yamama, for more than three days when the caliph allows them to enter there for something they need). [Reliance of the Traveller, O11.6, pg 608]

A non-Muslim may not enter the Meccan Sacred Precinct (Haram) under any circumstances [Reliance of the Traveller, O11.7, pg 608-9]

What breaks this horrible agreement?

(1) commits adultery with a Muslim woman or marries her;
(2) conceals spies of hostile forces;
(3) leads a Muslim away from Islam;
(4) kills a Muslim;
(5) or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam. [Reliance of the Traveller, O11.10, pg 609]

How much is Jizya?

The minimum non-Muslim poll tax is one dinar (n: 4.235 grams of gold) per person (A: per year). The maximum is whatever both sides agree upon. [Reliance of the Traveller, O11.4, pg 608]

I am pretty sure that the Caliph (i.e. Muslim tyrant whose every decision is equal to the Word of God, oops, I mean Allah) does the dealing with the non-Muslim with a very kind heart after massacre and destruction.

I should start calling this blog the instant depression reader.