Muhammad the Nymphomaniac [Sources]

Narrated Muhammad bin Al-Muntathir:
on the authority of his father that he had asked ‘Aisha (about the Hadith of Ibn ‘Umar). She said, “May Allah be Merciful to Abu ‘Abdur-Rahman. I used to put scent on Allah’s Apostle and he used to go round his wives, and in the morning he assumed the Ihram, and the fragrance of scent was still coming out from his body.” [Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 5, Hadith 267]

Narrated Qatada:
Anas bin Malik said, “The Prophet used to visit all his wives in a round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number.” I asked Anas, “Had the Prophet the strength for it?” Anas replied, “We used to say that the Prophet was given the strength of thirty (men).” And Sa’id said on the authority of Qatada that Anas had told him about nine wives only (not eleven). [Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 5, Hadith 268]

Narrated ‘Aisha:
…during his fatal ailment, Allah’s Apostle, used to ask his wives, “Where shall I stay tomorrow? Where shall I stay tomorrow?” He was looking forward to Aisha’s turn. So all his wives allowed him to stay where he wished, and he stayed at ‘Aisha’s house till he died there. He died on the day of my usual turn (of having sex) at my house. Allah took him unto him while his head was between my chest and my neck and his saliva was mixed with my SALIVA. [Sahih Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62, Hadith 144]

As soon as the pain subsided, he got up and visited with his wives just as he had always done. [Life of Muhammad by Muhammad Husayn Haykal, Chapter The Prophet’s Sickness and Death]

No matter how much we sugar coat the truth, the basic fact of the matter is that Muhammad is no Prophet, at best he was delusional which is definetly a no-no for a prophet. There is so much that can be written on Muhammad but I guess this is enough.

Section U3.8

U3.8 (N:) As for Allah’s creating acts, we believe that the real doer or everything is Allah. He is the one who burns, not the fire or the person who lighted the fire; He is the one who cuts, not the knife or the person holding the knife; He is the one who drowns a man, not the water or the person who threw him in, and so forth. Here, people always raise the question that if Allah Most High is the real doer, why are people held responsible? The answer is that Allah Most High does not hold people responsible for creating the act, but rather for choosing the act. One proof of this is that a person who cannot choose is not held responsible, such as someone asleep, insane, a child, forced, unremembering, or someone who makes an honest mistake. The legal responsibility of such people is lifted because they lack full voluntary choice. Another proof is that Nimrod sinned for choosing to burn Ibrahim (upon whom be peace) even though Ibrahim did not burn (koran 21:69); and that Ibrahim (Upon whom be peace) became the Friend of the All-merciful for choosing to sacrifice his son out of obedience to Allah,even though his knife did not cut and his son was not sacrificed (Koran 37:105), all of this showing that the servant is held  responsible for his choice, which scholars of the divine unity (tawhid) term the servant’s acquisition (kasb).
As for Allah’s eternally preexistent knowledge, we believe that Allah knows everything before, during, and after it is, and knows how it is when it occurs. But does the servant have acess to this knowledge? Not at all. So the servant chooses to do acts on the basis of a desire within himself, not because he knows Allah’s knowledge, and he is held responsible for his choice even though it corresponds with Allah’s eternally preexistent knowledge.
It is clear from the above that belief in destiny means that Muslims believe Allah has destined and ordained matters in past eternity, and that nothing in existence lies outside of His eternal will, and He is the Creator of everything, while the servant is only held responsible for his own choice (Mudhakkirai fi al-tawhid (y113), 41-12). [Relliance of the Traveller, U3.8, pg613-4]

First humans are only tools in the hand of Allah ie when we light a fire it is Allah who has lighted it and burned the wood. Second everything is predestined which reinforces the first point.

This is the kind of belief that destroys a nation for eternity. I can criticize Islam as much as I can but Muslim scholars are the biggest liability to Islam.

Sultan Erdogan

Sultan Erdogan initially supported the alAssad regime during the Arab Spring but then quickly changed its foregn policy

The Turkish Foreign Ministry initially recommended not getting involved, but Prime Minister Erdoğan, perhaps vainly, saw Turkey’s potential role as decisive and gradually became more engaged in the developing conflict. [Click For Full Article]

Phantom F-4

The downing of Turkish Plane F-4 Phantom by Syrians in June of last year must have come as a surpise to the Turks. But how the whole event unfolded must have hurt Sultan Erdogan even more as can be read here.

But the Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu let the world know what the Turkish Govt (or Sultan Erdogan) was thinking as can be seen below

But then the foreign minister started deviating (or not) from the script. He stressed, “No matter how the downed Turkish jet saga unfolds, we will always stand by [the] Syrian people”. And this; “We will always stand by Syrian people until the advent of a democratic regime there.” Forget about the F-4 Phantom; the “Syrian people” may sleep soundly because the heart of the matter remains regime change. [Click For Full Article]

Neo-Ottmonism in Iraq

While the Turkish Opposition parties don’t want Erdogan to go into Syria, with or without American support, but rather to move into Iraq

Instead, they said, launching a full-scale, deep and lasting land forces operation into northern Iraq would be a better use of resources and soldiers’ lives in order to put an end to the Kurdish separatist violence. [Click For Full Article]

24 November 2015

With the blessing of the USA (USAF F-15s) the Turks (F-16s) downed the Russian (Su-24).  So what happened?

The Turkish Air Force contends they warned the Russian aircraft 10 times over a span of 5 minutes before their jets opened fire. Visibly furious, Russian President Vladimir Putin responded to the Turkish version of events by calling the incident a “stab in the back by terrorist helpers.” [Click for Full Article]

The Turks claim that the Russian Plane entered Turkish airspace fopr 2-3 seconds while the Turks warned the Russians plane for 5 minutes. It smells so much like an ambush. Putting everything in perspective the Turks had a certain moral high ground until Sultan Erdogan dropped this bomb

… Ankara had not recognised the aircraft as Russian when it shot it down. [Click for Full Article]

There are plenty of news and analysis over this incident of the Russain downed plane as one can see here and here. Both discussing how the events are transpiring and what possible outcomes there can be.

Could this be part of the incidents that will later be regarded as the Archduke Franz Ferdinand assasination. Only time will tell. However Sultan Erdogan seems to be doing the wrong things and the world is beginning to see aspiration of a Sultan in Erdogan from buying oil from the ISIS/ISIL to cracking down on legitimate critics, protesters and reporters to down right “massacre” of Cizre.

At this point I would love it if Sulatan stopped hearing the voices of his advisors or any voices he might be hearing in his head. hee needs to take a vacation and let the other people in the government handle this problem along with the international community.

Jihad [Sources]

… “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year. [Reliance of the Traveller, O9.1, pg 600]

How is Jihad supposed to achieved each year?

… “One may also leave (or cease Jihad) if the opposing non-Muslim army is more than twice the size of the Muslim force” [ibid, O9.2, pg 601]

Something that ISIS/ISIL is not following in the Middle East or anywhere, oh but wait it says one MAY leave so I guess they are all right.

“Jihad is also (0: personally) obligatory for everyone (0: able to perform it, male or female, old or young) when the enemy has surrounded the Muslims (0: on every side, having entered our territory, even if the land consists of ruins, wilderness, or mountains, for non-Muslim forces entering Muslim lands is a weighty matter that cannot be ignored, but must be met with effort and struggle to repel them by every possible means.” [ibid, O9.3, pg 601]

“Muslims may not seek help from non­-Muslim allies unless the Muslims are considerably outnumbered and the allies are of goodwill towards the Muslims. [ibid, O9.7, pg 602]

To all those leftist apologists that make excuses for the behaviour of the Muslim behaving bad read it and weep.

Jizya’s importance

… invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non­-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: 011.4)-which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral reli­gions) [ibis, O9.8, pg 602]

Duty of Caliph

The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (0: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permited to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) (n: though according to the Hanafi school, peoples of all other religions, even idol worshippers, are permitted to live under the protection of the Islamic state if they either become Muslim or agree to pay the poll tax, the sale exceptions to which are apostates from Islam and idol worshippers who are Arabs, neither of whom has any choice but becoming Muslim (al-Hidaya sharh
Bidaya al-mubtadi’ (y21). 6.48–49)) [ibid, O9.9, pg 603]

Slavery

When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled. [ibid, O9.13, pg 604]

Truces

“So do not be fainthearted and call for peace, when it is you who are the uppermost” (Koran 47:35).

… Truces are permissible, not obligatory. [ibid, O9.16(2), pg 605]

… There must be some interest served in making a truce other than mere preservation of the status quo. [ibid, O9.16(2), pg 605]

I think I have done enough soul deadening for myself today and this is only O9 and I haven’t gotten to O10 and more.

Deen e Hanif

Why I chose Deen e Hanif as my title, has to do with the fact that Hanif, just like the word Hoor in Koran has been a mistranslation. Hanif actually meant heathen (while Hoor means white raisins, good luck dead suicide terrorists)

For centuries the religious people had unparalleled power rivaled only by the state and there were endless wars, absolute poverty, slavery, child-brides, genital mutilation, famine disease, blood sacrifice on and on. each time the religion claimed absolute knowledge of everything, economics, morality, biology, cosmology mixed with astrology, alchemy etc. However nothing the religious ever claimed worked as per the religious peoples claim, i.e. if you are ill then the deity is mad and the deity is cleaning you and if you don’t get healed then you need to atone for your sins and if it is not working then you were not sincere and do it all over again. every battle started with the prayers to the deity and often times both sides prayed to the same deity with one side winning and the other side losing. Why did one side win and not the other side?

Religious contribution towards the well being of the humanity and the environment (that doesn’t get mentioned enough) is nil. Religious people have constantly resisted change, supporting slavery till it finally died (although the jihadis have resurrected this evil practice again). Religious people give others only misery in the form of endless misery, emotional trauma rooted in fearing a non-existent deity and an endless logical fallacies such as if the deity is all powerful why is there poverty, injustice, human birth defects, anarchy in the whole universe etc.

Religious people have lied over and over again and every time the religious people have been caught with their pants down, they deny the error and change the whole meaning of the text and do large number of apologies that would not be sufficient if presented for criminal in the court of law. Religious people claimed victory when some passages in their text agreed with science but when other passages disagreed they went to the end of the earth to try to discredit the truth i.e. evolution.

Why do religious lie and never admit to the truth? Why are the religious people hypocritical?

There are many reason but I would present a few as to why the religious people say they are for the truth and then follow a lie. Religious people have lived in the position of power so long that they can’t let go of all the power, the free money, tax-breaks, at the cost of those who are intellectually dumbed down by the state working with the  religious figures. To the religious figures it doesn’t matter that they are causing couples to have a miserable life, always relating to the holy text instead of working out the problems by themselves.

Religious people have stopped their disciples from learning the truth, that is beautiful and sweet. All religious people have done is destroy their disciples lives and personality over trivial matters.

Religions and religious people have killed each other and will continue to kill each other.

It’s time people accept the cold hard facts that religion is a wish full thinking and a fantasy that will forever torment you and instead its time we all accept personal responsibility. Live a life we want and work towards making ourselves better and enjoy the little and happiness that comes our way and face the other side as well.