Muhammad the Nymphomaniac [Sources]

Narrated Muhammad bin Al-Muntathir:
on the authority of his father that he had asked ‘Aisha (about the Hadith of Ibn ‘Umar). She said, “May Allah be Merciful to Abu ‘Abdur-Rahman. I used to put scent on Allah’s Apostle and he used to go round his wives, and in the morning he assumed the Ihram, and the fragrance of scent was still coming out from his body.” [Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 5, Hadith 267]

Narrated Qatada:
Anas bin Malik said, “The Prophet used to visit all his wives in a round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number.” I asked Anas, “Had the Prophet the strength for it?” Anas replied, “We used to say that the Prophet was given the strength of thirty (men).” And Sa’id said on the authority of Qatada that Anas had told him about nine wives only (not eleven). [Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 5, Hadith 268]

Narrated ‘Aisha:
…during his fatal ailment, Allah’s Apostle, used to ask his wives, “Where shall I stay tomorrow? Where shall I stay tomorrow?” He was looking forward to Aisha’s turn. So all his wives allowed him to stay where he wished, and he stayed at ‘Aisha’s house till he died there. He died on the day of my usual turn (of having sex) at my house. Allah took him unto him while his head was between my chest and my neck and his saliva was mixed with my SALIVA. [Sahih Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62, Hadith 144]

As soon as the pain subsided, he got up and visited with his wives just as he had always done. [Life of Muhammad by Muhammad Husayn Haykal, Chapter The Prophet’s Sickness and Death]

No matter how much we sugar coat the truth, the basic fact of the matter is that Muhammad is no Prophet, at best he was delusional which is definetly a no-no for a prophet. There is so much that can be written on Muhammad but I guess this is enough.

Section U3.8

U3.8 (N:) As for Allah’s creating acts, we believe that the real doer or everything is Allah. He is the one who burns, not the fire or the person who lighted the fire; He is the one who cuts, not the knife or the person holding the knife; He is the one who drowns a man, not the water or the person who threw him in, and so forth. Here, people always raise the question that if Allah Most High is the real doer, why are people held responsible? The answer is that Allah Most High does not hold people responsible for creating the act, but rather for choosing the act. One proof of this is that a person who cannot choose is not held responsible, such as someone asleep, insane, a child, forced, unremembering, or someone who makes an honest mistake. The legal responsibility of such people is lifted because they lack full voluntary choice. Another proof is that Nimrod sinned for choosing to burn Ibrahim (upon whom be peace) even though Ibrahim did not burn (koran 21:69); and that Ibrahim (Upon whom be peace) became the Friend of the All-merciful for choosing to sacrifice his son out of obedience to Allah,even though his knife did not cut and his son was not sacrificed (Koran 37:105), all of this showing that the servant is held  responsible for his choice, which scholars of the divine unity (tawhid) term the servant’s acquisition (kasb).
As for Allah’s eternally preexistent knowledge, we believe that Allah knows everything before, during, and after it is, and knows how it is when it occurs. But does the servant have acess to this knowledge? Not at all. So the servant chooses to do acts on the basis of a desire within himself, not because he knows Allah’s knowledge, and he is held responsible for his choice even though it corresponds with Allah’s eternally preexistent knowledge.
It is clear from the above that belief in destiny means that Muslims believe Allah has destined and ordained matters in past eternity, and that nothing in existence lies outside of His eternal will, and He is the Creator of everything, while the servant is only held responsible for his own choice (Mudhakkirai fi al-tawhid (y113), 41-12). [Relliance of the Traveller, U3.8, pg613-4]

First humans are only tools in the hand of Allah ie when we light a fire it is Allah who has lighted it and burned the wood. Second everything is predestined which reinforces the first point.

This is the kind of belief that destroys a nation for eternity. I can criticize Islam as much as I can but Muslim scholars are the biggest liability to Islam.

Umar the Pervert [Sources]

Umar bin alKhattab the pervert was responsible for the verses of hijab. Umar the pervert spied on the wives of the Prophet in the night and called them out with their names upon recognising them. Don’t believe me.

  • Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 4, Hadith 148
  • Sahih Bukhari, Volume 8, Book 74, Hadith 257
  • Sahih Muslim, Book 26, Hadith 5397
  • Sahih Muslim, Book 26, Hadith 5398

After this incident all of a sudden Allah decided to reveal the verses regarding hijab. Once the hijab was established Umar felt the urge to make sure that the rules were being followed and he spied on the women once again. What can you say once a pervert always a pervert.

  • Sahih Bukhari, Volume 6, Book 60, Hadith 318
  • Sahih Muslim, Book 26, Hadith 5395
  • Sahih Muslim, Book 26, Hadith 5396

Umar the pervert needs to be exposed as being a vile guy that would go to jail in our times but according to muslims he is to be regarded as a Caliph.

This is why muslims are made fun of in the modern world. These are the followers of Muhammad and what is more surprising that Muhammad is not pissed off at Umar nor reprimands him, what kind of a universal morality was he preaching? Muhammad proves that Islam is anti woman.

Ahl alDhimma [Sources]

Who are not Ahl alDhimma?

… those who are idol worshippers (dis: o9.9 (n:)), or those who do not have a Sacred Book or something that could have been a Book. [Reliance of the Traveller, O11.2, pg 607]

… As for the pseudo-scriptures of cults that have appeared since Islam (n: such as the Sikhs, Baha’ is, Mormons, Qadianis, etc.), they neither are nor could be a Book, since the Koran is the final revelation (dis: w4).) [Reliance of the Traveller, O11.2, pg 607]

So idol-worshippers and any cults after the advent of Islam can not be part of the agreement that makes non-muslims a second-class citizen.

What things can be regulated by the agreement?

… follow the rules of Islam  (A: those mentioned below (o11.5) and those involving public behavior  and dress, though in acts of worship and their private lives, the subject communities have their own laws, judges, and courts, enforcing the rules of their own religion among themselves); (b) and pay the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya)  [Reliance of the Traveller, O11.3, pg 607]

… (2) are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar); [Reliance of the Traveller, O.11.5, pg 608]

(4) must keep to the side of the street;
(5) may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;
(6) are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;
(7) and are forbidden to build new churches. [Reliance of the Traveller, O11.5, pg 608]

Basically all the individual liberty is taken from ahl alDhimma. But Wait there is more

They are forbidden to reside in the Hijaz, meaning the area and towns around Mecca, Medina, and Yamama, for more than three days when the caliph allows them to enter there for something they need). [Reliance of the Traveller, O11.6, pg 608]

A non-Muslim may not enter the Meccan Sacred Precinct (Haram) under any circumstances [Reliance of the Traveller, O11.7, pg 608-9]

What breaks this horrible agreement?

(1) commits adultery with a Muslim woman or marries her;
(2) conceals spies of hostile forces;
(3) leads a Muslim away from Islam;
(4) kills a Muslim;
(5) or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam. [Reliance of the Traveller, O11.10, pg 609]

How much is Jizya?

The minimum non-Muslim poll tax is one dinar (n: 4.235 grams of gold) per person (A: per year). The maximum is whatever both sides agree upon. [Reliance of the Traveller, O11.4, pg 608]

I am pretty sure that the Caliph (i.e. Muslim tyrant whose every decision is equal to the Word of God, oops, I mean Allah) does the dealing with the non-Muslim with a very kind heart after massacre and destruction.

I should start calling this blog the instant depression reader.



Deen e Hanif

Why I chose Deen e Hanif as my title, has to do with the fact that Hanif, just like the word Hoor in Koran has been a mistranslation. Hanif actually meant heathen (while Hoor means white raisins, good luck dead suicide terrorists)

For centuries the religious people had unparalleled power rivaled only by the state and there were endless wars, absolute poverty, slavery, child-brides, genital mutilation, famine disease, blood sacrifice on and on. each time the religion claimed absolute knowledge of everything, economics, morality, biology, cosmology mixed with astrology, alchemy etc. However nothing the religious ever claimed worked as per the religious peoples claim, i.e. if you are ill then the deity is mad and the deity is cleaning you and if you don’t get healed then you need to atone for your sins and if it is not working then you were not sincere and do it all over again. every battle started with the prayers to the deity and often times both sides prayed to the same deity with one side winning and the other side losing. Why did one side win and not the other side?

Religious contribution towards the well being of the humanity and the environment (that doesn’t get mentioned enough) is nil. Religious people have constantly resisted change, supporting slavery till it finally died (although the jihadis have resurrected this evil practice again). Religious people give others only misery in the form of endless misery, emotional trauma rooted in fearing a non-existent deity and an endless logical fallacies such as if the deity is all powerful why is there poverty, injustice, human birth defects, anarchy in the whole universe etc.

Religious people have lied over and over again and every time the religious people have been caught with their pants down, they deny the error and change the whole meaning of the text and do large number of apologies that would not be sufficient if presented for criminal in the court of law. Religious people claimed victory when some passages in their text agreed with science but when other passages disagreed they went to the end of the earth to try to discredit the truth i.e. evolution.

Why do religious lie and never admit to the truth? Why are the religious people hypocritical?

There are many reason but I would present a few as to why the religious people say they are for the truth and then follow a lie. Religious people have lived in the position of power so long that they can’t let go of all the power, the free money, tax-breaks, at the cost of those who are intellectually dumbed down by the state working with the  religious figures. To the religious figures it doesn’t matter that they are causing couples to have a miserable life, always relating to the holy text instead of working out the problems by themselves.

Religious people have stopped their disciples from learning the truth, that is beautiful and sweet. All religious people have done is destroy their disciples lives and personality over trivial matters.

Religions and religious people have killed each other and will continue to kill each other.

It’s time people accept the cold hard facts that religion is a wish full thinking and a fantasy that will forever torment you and instead its time we all accept personal responsibility. Live a life we want and work towards making ourselves better and enjoy the little and happiness that comes our way and face the other side as well.