Section U3.8

U3.8 (N:) As for Allah’s creating acts, we believe that the real doer or everything is Allah. He is the one who burns, not the fire or the person who lighted the fire; He is the one who cuts, not the knife or the person holding the knife; He is the one who drowns a man, not the water or the person who threw him in, and so forth. Here, people always raise the question that if Allah Most High is the real doer, why are people held responsible? The answer is that Allah Most High does not hold people responsible for creating the act, but rather for choosing the act. One proof of this is that a person who cannot choose is not held responsible, such as someone asleep, insane, a child, forced, unremembering, or someone who makes an honest mistake. The legal responsibility of such people is lifted because they lack full voluntary choice. Another proof is that Nimrod sinned for choosing to burn Ibrahim (upon whom be peace) even though Ibrahim did not burn (koran 21:69); and that Ibrahim (Upon whom be peace) became the Friend of the All-merciful for choosing to sacrifice his son out of obedience to Allah,even though his knife did not cut and his son was not sacrificed (Koran 37:105), all of this showing that the servant is held  responsible for his choice, which scholars of the divine unity (tawhid) term the servant’s acquisition (kasb).
As for Allah’s eternally preexistent knowledge, we believe that Allah knows everything before, during, and after it is, and knows how it is when it occurs. But does the servant have acess to this knowledge? Not at all. So the servant chooses to do acts on the basis of a desire within himself, not because he knows Allah’s knowledge, and he is held responsible for his choice even though it corresponds with Allah’s eternally preexistent knowledge.
It is clear from the above that belief in destiny means that Muslims believe Allah has destined and ordained matters in past eternity, and that nothing in existence lies outside of His eternal will, and He is the Creator of everything, while the servant is only held responsible for his own choice (Mudhakkirai fi al-tawhid (y113), 41-12). [Relliance of the Traveller, U3.8, pg613-4]

First humans are only tools in the hand of Allah ie when we light a fire it is Allah who has lighted it and burned the wood. Second everything is predestined which reinforces the first point.

This is the kind of belief that destroys a nation for eternity. I can criticize Islam as much as I can but Muslim scholars are the biggest liability to Islam.

Advertisements

Science v Islam

This is just a short version based on collective works of all the other people.

Astronomy – The fact that Koran omits the movement of the earth rather talks about the sun and the moon is clear evidence that Koran was a man made book.

Biology – Adam and Eve rather than evolution is a clear cut example that the Koran is false.

Geology – Mountains do not prevent earthquake something the Koran is full of.

Zoology – Horses, Mules and asses were created by Allah to ride not mentioning how the humans breeded them from the wild.

There are plenty of crazy stuff but Jonah’s story is a clear example of all claim and no evidence.

These are my top reason as to why Islam and Koran are false and that it was a man made book.

Aisha the Strip-Tease [Sources]

Narrated Abu Salama:
‘Aisha’s brother and I went to ‘Aisha and he asked her about the bath of the Prophet. She brought a pot containing about a Sa’ of water and took a bath and poured it over her head and at what time there was a screen between her and us. [Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 5, Hadith 251]

Abu Salama b. ‘Abd al-Rahman reported: I along with the foster brother of ‘A’isha went to her and he asked about the bath of the Apostle (may peace be upon him) because of sexual intercourse. She called for a vessel equal to a Sa’ and she took a bath and there was a curtain between us and her. She poured water on her head thrice and he (Abu Salama) said: The wives of the Apostle (may peace be upon him) collectedhair on their heads and these lopped up to ears (and did rot go beyond that). [Sahih Muslim, Book 3, Hadith 626]

It was narrated from Abu  Bakr bin Hafs: “I heard Abu Salamah say: ‘I entered upon  Aishah and her foster-brother was with her. He asked her about the Ghusl of the Prophet. She called for a vessel which was a Sa’ of water, then she concealed herself and performed Ghusl and poured water over her head three times.”‘ (Sahih) [Sunan anNasai, Volume 1, Book 1, Chapter 144, Hadith 228]

So Aisha the wife of Muhammad used to provide a drop in strip-tease for those who came to her home and I don’t know how much satisfaction she gave to the customers, sorry, I mean the student of Islam.

Umar the Pervert [Sources]

Umar bin alKhattab the pervert was responsible for the verses of hijab. Umar the pervert spied on the wives of the Prophet in the night and called them out with their names upon recognising them. Don’t believe me.

  • Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 4, Hadith 148
  • Sahih Bukhari, Volume 8, Book 74, Hadith 257
  • Sahih Muslim, Book 26, Hadith 5397
  • Sahih Muslim, Book 26, Hadith 5398

After this incident all of a sudden Allah decided to reveal the verses regarding hijab. Once the hijab was established Umar felt the urge to make sure that the rules were being followed and he spied on the women once again. What can you say once a pervert always a pervert.

  • Sahih Bukhari, Volume 6, Book 60, Hadith 318
  • Sahih Muslim, Book 26, Hadith 5395
  • Sahih Muslim, Book 26, Hadith 5396

Umar the pervert needs to be exposed as being a vile guy that would go to jail in our times but according to muslims he is to be regarded as a Caliph.

This is why muslims are made fun of in the modern world. These are the followers of Muhammad and what is more surprising that Muhammad is not pissed off at Umar nor reprimands him, what kind of a universal morality was he preaching? Muhammad proves that Islam is anti woman.

Jihad [Sources]

… “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year. [Reliance of the Traveller, O9.1, pg 600]

How is Jihad supposed to achieved each year?

… “One may also leave (or cease Jihad) if the opposing non-Muslim army is more than twice the size of the Muslim force” [ibid, O9.2, pg 601]

Something that ISIS/ISIL is not following in the Middle East or anywhere, oh but wait it says one MAY leave so I guess they are all right.

“Jihad is also (0: personally) obligatory for everyone (0: able to perform it, male or female, old or young) when the enemy has surrounded the Muslims (0: on every side, having entered our territory, even if the land consists of ruins, wilderness, or mountains, for non-Muslim forces entering Muslim lands is a weighty matter that cannot be ignored, but must be met with effort and struggle to repel them by every possible means.” [ibid, O9.3, pg 601]

“Muslims may not seek help from non­-Muslim allies unless the Muslims are considerably outnumbered and the allies are of goodwill towards the Muslims. [ibid, O9.7, pg 602]

To all those leftist apologists that make excuses for the behaviour of the Muslim behaving bad read it and weep.

Jizya’s importance

… invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non­-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: 011.4)-which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral reli­gions) [ibis, O9.8, pg 602]

Duty of Caliph

The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (0: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permited to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) (n: though according to the Hanafi school, peoples of all other religions, even idol worshippers, are permitted to live under the protection of the Islamic state if they either become Muslim or agree to pay the poll tax, the sale exceptions to which are apostates from Islam and idol worshippers who are Arabs, neither of whom has any choice but becoming Muslim (al-Hidaya sharh
Bidaya al-mubtadi’ (y21). 6.48–49)) [ibid, O9.9, pg 603]

Slavery

When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled. [ibid, O9.13, pg 604]

Truces

“So do not be fainthearted and call for peace, when it is you who are the uppermost” (Koran 47:35).

… Truces are permissible, not obligatory. [ibid, O9.16(2), pg 605]

… There must be some interest served in making a truce other than mere preservation of the status quo. [ibid, O9.16(2), pg 605]

I think I have done enough soul deadening for myself today and this is only O9 and I haven’t gotten to O10 and more.

Deen e Hanif

Why I chose Deen e Hanif as my title, has to do with the fact that Hanif, just like the word Hoor in Koran has been a mistranslation. Hanif actually meant heathen (while Hoor means white raisins, good luck dead suicide terrorists)

For centuries the religious people had unparalleled power rivaled only by the state and there were endless wars, absolute poverty, slavery, child-brides, genital mutilation, famine disease, blood sacrifice on and on. each time the religion claimed absolute knowledge of everything, economics, morality, biology, cosmology mixed with astrology, alchemy etc. However nothing the religious ever claimed worked as per the religious peoples claim, i.e. if you are ill then the deity is mad and the deity is cleaning you and if you don’t get healed then you need to atone for your sins and if it is not working then you were not sincere and do it all over again. every battle started with the prayers to the deity and often times both sides prayed to the same deity with one side winning and the other side losing. Why did one side win and not the other side?

Religious contribution towards the well being of the humanity and the environment (that doesn’t get mentioned enough) is nil. Religious people have constantly resisted change, supporting slavery till it finally died (although the jihadis have resurrected this evil practice again). Religious people give others only misery in the form of endless misery, emotional trauma rooted in fearing a non-existent deity and an endless logical fallacies such as if the deity is all powerful why is there poverty, injustice, human birth defects, anarchy in the whole universe etc.

Religious people have lied over and over again and every time the religious people have been caught with their pants down, they deny the error and change the whole meaning of the text and do large number of apologies that would not be sufficient if presented for criminal in the court of law. Religious people claimed victory when some passages in their text agreed with science but when other passages disagreed they went to the end of the earth to try to discredit the truth i.e. evolution.

Why do religious lie and never admit to the truth? Why are the religious people hypocritical?

There are many reason but I would present a few as to why the religious people say they are for the truth and then follow a lie. Religious people have lived in the position of power so long that they can’t let go of all the power, the free money, tax-breaks, at the cost of those who are intellectually dumbed down by the state working with the  religious figures. To the religious figures it doesn’t matter that they are causing couples to have a miserable life, always relating to the holy text instead of working out the problems by themselves.

Religious people have stopped their disciples from learning the truth, that is beautiful and sweet. All religious people have done is destroy their disciples lives and personality over trivial matters.

Religions and religious people have killed each other and will continue to kill each other.

It’s time people accept the cold hard facts that religion is a wish full thinking and a fantasy that will forever torment you and instead its time we all accept personal responsibility. Live a life we want and work towards making ourselves better and enjoy the little and happiness that comes our way and face the other side as well.